ENGINEERING STATUS · 25 OCTOBER 2026
BTG Universal Technology Economy — development update
BTG's current research design spans Studio's universal software reconstruction, adaptive DataChips, FarmNode hardware-aware resource execution, open ENTITY identities, governed Bridge data permissions and a technology-use economy. New verified local results and remaining release limits are described in the engineering expansion.
Latest engineering expansion · Technical evidence and manuals
ENGINEERING EVIDENCE · 24 OCTOBER 2026
Five connected BTG systems — current integration record
Bridge HTTP/ASGI: 9/9 PASS. Latest comprehensive 169-test run has one unresolved original encrypted-ENTITY peer import error. Shared authoritative account integration remains incomplete.
Read the full five-system engineering update · Technical documentation
Connections and readiness
A practical readiness guide for providers, devices and sources. Only confirmed, version-specific integrations can be represented as supported.
Connector-readiness matrix
Categories describe possible integration scopes. The public record does not establish production certification of named providers for the following categories.
| Source category | Intended boundary | Public qualification |
|---|---|---|
| Local files and controlled storage | Device and user permissions, limited file fields, expiry and retention | Provider-specific pass not published |
| Institutional databases and APIs | Administrator authority, authenticated scopes, supported fields | External compatibility not established |
| Cloud services | Provider consent, contractual terms, cross-border processing | No certified providers published |
| Field and mobile devices | Supported OS/hardware, local controls, offline recovery | Version-specific evidence required |
| BTG internal research components | Bounded research jobs, provenance, accountable permissions | Original local Bridge-to-FarmNode/BTDU/ENTITY chain passed 50 tests; no remote production connector |
What qualifies a supported connector
A connector’s supported status requires an identified service or device, version, authenticated method, approved grant scope, data-field mapping, error and revocation behavior, encryption and credential handling, logging, test fixtures and tested delivery conditions. A marketing icon or provider name alone cannot establish compatibility.
An integration may be technically feasible or prototyped without completing a supported production service. The public record should distinguish planned adapters, internal proofs, verified end-to-end integrations and independently assessed deployments.
Source families and current public evidence
Local files and authorized storage: a proposed source family; compatible operating systems, storage permissions, size limits and retention need product-specific confirmation. Business databases and APIs: proposed integration category; named provider certifications are not supplied in the current public record. Mobile phones and field devices: proposed device category; actual builds and supported hardware versions require qualification.
Cloud repositories and institutional applications: provider-specific use conditions and administrator approval apply; no blanket live connector certification is established here. Research FarmNodes and internal BTG systems: a genuine original-runtime synthetic-input chain passed 50 local tests on 20 October, including bounded Circuit execution, BTDU cold reconstruction and encrypted ENTITY loopback. No third-party provider certification or independently qualified remote host is established by those results.
Authority before access
An approving user or institutional administrator must have the right to grant the requested scope. Bridge should support refusal, expiry, field-level minimization and recipient controls. The fact that an account is authenticated does not mean every dataset in the account may lawfully be contributed to commercial research.
Evidence for a real pilot
A qualification packet should name the participating institution, connector and version, identity and permissions, encryption boundaries, tested fields and conditions, exercised revoke/expiry events, observed failures and user-approved acceptance criteria. For sensitive data, legal and security review should precede substantive processing.
BTG’s public information currently does not establish a general certification matrix with named third-party providers and passed end-to-end outcomes. This page therefore does not use unsupported “fully integrated” status badges.
Integration enquiry
Prospective partners can describe the target data source without sending data, the controller’s identity and authority, deployment platform, geography, required operations and a contact for institutional technical and privacy review. BTG can then determine the appropriate engineering and contract path.